Differences Between Lattice Tower and Monopole

When it comes to choosing support structures for communication, new energy and infrastructure projects, understanding the differences between lattice towers and monopoles is crucial for making optimal decisions. Lattice towers, such as those offered by Maotong, feature a truss frame design that gives them high visual recognition. This design, while distinct in appearance, requires a foundation floor space ranging from 30 to 100 square meters. In terms of performance, lattice towers stand out with strong load capacity, easily supporting the superposition of multiple pieces of equipment. They also boast high wind resistance, capable of withstanding wind speeds up to 200 kilometers per hour. Maintenance of lattice towers is convenient too, as individual components can be replaced without the need for full system overhauls.

Monopoles, on the other hand, have a slim single-pipe structure that provides strong concealment, making them less visually obtrusive in various environments. Their foundation requirements are much more compact, needing only 3 to 10 square meters of floor space. However, monopoles have limited load capacity, primarily suitable for single-system setups. Their wind resistance is moderate, with a maximum tolerance of 120 kilometers per hour. Maintenance of monopoles is more challenging, often requiring overall inspection of the entire structure. In terms of applicable scenarios, lattice towers are ideal for suburban communication hubs, wind power bases and large substations, while monopoles are better suited for urban core areas and small rooftop stations. Lattice towers also have a longer design life of 50 years and can be reused for relocation and reconstruction, whereas monopoles typically have a 25 to 30-year design life and offer low recycling value, factors that significantly impact long-term project costs and sustainability.